Posted by
MiikiMike on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:00:00 AM
Misfit Elected Liberal Democratic Party Leaders, Namely the Congressional Black Caucus Who Show Contempt for the Constitution is the Problem!
"I enjoyed reading this post, as well as a couple of others. I have wondered why black people won't buck their leadership and say they are being hurt the most with illegal immigration. Illegals mostly settle into inner cities, but even when they don't they take up blue collar jobs such as construction. I know why black leadership are for illegal immigration as well as keeping black people down... so they can keep their positions of power. No one is going to listen to a word Sharpton says if things are doing well in the black community."
Well said Jesse "The Mind" Norman......
……..and in the event this trend continues, the Black community can only blame itself for driving the Black community into extinction.
****************************************
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/01/10/rep_clybu rn_reading_of_the_constitution_egged_on_conduct_of_az_shoot ing.html
....."Rep. Clyburn: "Reading Of The Constitution" Contributed To Climate Of AZ Shooting"
.....Clyburn and multiple members of the Congressional Black Caucus are a disgrace to the essence of what it means to be an elected official. The fact that few if any of these elected officials from the Congressional Black Caucus fulfill his or her sworn duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Rule of Law.....
.....make these individuals a huge part of the problem of making our government dysfunctional and out of reach of deserving law abiding U.S. born inner-city residents.
**************************************************
Democrats, such as Chicago’s Jesse Jackson Jr., questioned which version of the Constitution would be read on Thursday, arguing that the original showed how far the nation had come through amending and reinterpreting the Constitution to reflect the evolution of society.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/la-pn-constitution-congress-20110106,0,1883472.story?track=rss-topicgallery
"The new Republican majority and their redacted constitutional reading gives little deference to the long history of improving the Constitution and only seeks an interpretation of our Constitution based on the now, not the historic, broad body of law and struggle that it has taken to get there. It leaves out the need to continue to refine the Constitution so that we have a more perfect union,” by Congressman Jesse Jackson
*******************************************
What difference does it make which version of the Constitution is read, when in contemporary years there is only one U.S. Constitution that we are all bound to live by?.
U.S. born Black men, women, and/or his or her siblings, were not even considered citizens until the 13th and 14th amendment came into being as part of the U.S. Constitution.
I’m pleased to see Republican elected officials read the Constitution aloud to multiple members of the Democratic Party. Far too many elected officials, pertaining to the Congressional Black Caucus, and/or liberal Democratic elected officials who hold or have held elected office, show no regard for the U.S. Constitution, the principles of government of the United States, etc. etc. I’m willing to bet many Democratic Party members, especially the Democratic Congressional Black Caucus and/or liberal Democrat Party elected officials, whose career in government is mandated to support the “rule of law” have shunned the U.S. Constitution, the “Bill of Rights”, the Declaration of Independence, etc., etc.
It is more important that every elected official uphold his or her sworn duty to respect the U.S. Constitution, and/or any respective State Constitution. By and large elected Black leaders affiliated with the liberal segment of Democratic Party, be it of local, county, state, and/or federal jurisdiction have no regard for the U.S. Constitution and/or any State Constitution. . Elected Black leaders such as President Barack Obama, and/or multiple members of the Congressional Black Caucus….more likely the Congressional Black Caustic……
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-182700
http://ceyseau.net/AboutUs.html
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-37187
http://deadwiler.blogtownhall.com/
…….. refuse to uphold the Constitution for the 13th and 14th Amendment, in the economy and political process in Los Angeles, Compton, Baltimore, Detroit, Oakland, New Orleans, Inglewood, New Jersey, etc., etc., etc., of most any former or present predominate demographic Black community:
A. Is based upon breaking up generations of the law abiding U.S. born Black family for profit.
B. Dishonoring the rights of honorably discharged Black Veterans, such as my Dad, Leon E. Lofton, Jr.
C. Playing games of deceit and/or gerrymandering to keep disgraceful elected officials in office.
D. Promote “Black Code Law Enforcement”
E. Promote the survival and prosperity of criminals, illegal immigrants, subversives.
F. Drive into extinction the survival and prosperity of law abiding U.S. born Black men, women, and/or his or her sibling.
G. Keep U.S. born Black men, women, and/or his or her sibling dependent on welfare, and unemployed or unemployable.
******************************************
House reads the Constitution, line by line, Republicans in the House of Representatives flexed their new muscle by insisting on a reading of the entire Constitution. Democrats inquired whether it would be the original version of the document, which included the Three-Fifths Compromise, designed to increase the power of the slave-holding states. Birther interrupts the proceedings.
by Michael Muskal, Los Angeles Times, 9:32 AM PST, January 6, 2011
It would seem that if there were anything above the partisan political fray, the reading of the Constitution, the nation’s highest law, would be on that pedestal.
But apparently even that isn't above politics. Republicans in the House of Representatives flexed their new political muscle with a multiple-hour, line-by-line reading of the Constitution. It was the first time that such a reading had taken place publicly in the chamber and it fulfilled a campaign pledge pushed by the GOP’s conservative wing and the ‘ tea party” movement.
The action was designed both as political theater and a reminder to the nation’s lawmakers of what conservatives see as the nation’s founding principles that back a strict constructionist view of a limited government. It is the vision of limited government that Republicans see as one of their touchstones for the new Congress.
But the recitation of the Constitution was a chance for Democrats to score points while piously praising the historicity of the Constitution. They initially questioned whether the document would be read in full in its original language or in its amended form.
In its original form, the Constitution included sections such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, designed to increase the power of the slave-holding states by allowing slaves to be counted toward the allocation of congressmen, even though slaves were seen as property and obviously couldn’t vote. Nor could women vote in those times when all men, except slaves, were created equal.
Slavery, and its political implications, led to the Civil War, of course. But even in its time, it was so divisive that noted abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison took the Constitution to task. "The United States Constitution is a covenant with death and an agreement with hell" became the motto on his journal, Liberator.
Current House Democrats, such as Chicago’s Jesse Jackson Jr., questioned which version of the Constitution would be read on Thursday, arguing that the original showed how far the nation had come through amending and reinterpreting the Constitution to reflect the evolution of society.
"The new Republican majority and their redacted constitutional reading gives little deference to the long history of improving the Constitution and only seeks an interpretation of our Constitution based on the now, not the historic, broad body of law and struggle that it has taken to get there. It leaves out the need to continue to refine the Constitution so that we have a more perfect union,” he stated.
That principle, sharply at odds with the GOP’s, is part of the Democrats’ vision of government as a growing entity that should have a role in dealing with the nation’s problems.
As the reading of the amended version went on for several hours, there was at least one outburst from the gallery as a person interrupted to say Obama wasn’t born in the United States, hence was constitutionally barred from being president. No effort, including the release of his birth certificate, by President Obama has dispelled the false rumors of his birth that continue to have traction with the so-called birther movement.
“First interruption of the reading from the Gallery. By a birther, screaming about Obama. Unintended consequences,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) tweeted from the House floor.
michael.muskal@latimes.com, twitter.com/LATimesmuskal
Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times